Showing posts with label Christmas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christmas. Show all posts

Saturday, February 1, 2014

Guatemala, Part Eleven: My Hat -- Really

(continued from Part Ten)

As I said, I have more to say about the hat.

Getting back to the beginning of that outing:  I was definitely on the lookout for some kind of hat when we went into town.  The tropical sun was merciless, and I don't have nearly as much hair on top as I used to.  We hadn't gone far from the car when my eye was caught by piles and piles of hats at the entrance of a shop -- neatly nested stacks of cheap-looking local-style straw hats for tourists -- straw hats with colored bands.  They pulled me like a magnet.  I didn't even pause to make sure that somebody in the family knew where I was going.

I had to pick a good one.  My vacation hat was not going to have a black band, for example.  I needed something bright, ideally multicolored.  The hats with rainbow bands all seemed to be too small.  I began shifting hats from stack to stack, peering inside them one after another.  Just as I was beginning to get discouraged, a sales lady came and helped me.  In no time I had what I needed -- a big enough hat with a mostly red band -- and I happily hurried away to find the family.

I don't want to make too much of this hat.  It's just a hat.  For the rest of the trip I wore it a lot, because, well, I needed protection from the sun.  Also because it was my hat.  I started calling it "my silly tourist hat."

During our first visit with Amadi's birthmother and her kids, I omitted the hat even when we went out for a walk on the sunny streets.  I was self-conscious about looking like a foreigner who foolishly tries to dress up like a local.  Also, I wore shiny black dress shoes that day.  We had the idea that, although we are in the habit of going barefoot indoors at home, it might be offensive to do so when receiving guests in a strange country; and I took this principle one step further and put on my good shiny shoes instead of my shabby tattered sneakers that day.

When packing for the trip, I had stuck those "grownup Daddy shoes" in the suitcase.  At the time, that choice on my part had struck me as odd.  I had tentatively classified it as one of those irrational things that people do when preparing for a trip, as they try to fend off the anxiety that goes with heading into the unknown.  On the other hand, I also thought that it might have been a perfectly sensible choice, in which case maybe my having doubts about it could be classified as one of those irrational things people do when preparing for a trip ...   When Tesi saw me unpacking the shoes in Antigua, it became clear that she also found it an odd choice.  But I think my reasoning was sound:  (a) even a person like me who always packs light for a trip should probably take more than one pair of shoes along, (b) it's true that I don't wear these shoes much at home, but it's also true that they are very comfortable, (c) if I want to dress up just a little better than usual at any point (for example when meeting the birth family), these shoes will help, and (d) while the sight of me in shoes like these might startle those who know me well, it is a completely unremarkable sight for the rest of the world.

(I call them "grownup Daddy shoes" because that's what they feel like.  I suppose the right term is "dress shoes."  They are extremely plain, but shiny.  When I put them on, or when I put any dress shoes on, it almost feels as if I'm putting on a coat and tie.  And putting on a coat and tie feels like putting on a costume, like I'm trying to disguise myself as a grownup.  For many men these would be everyday shoes.  Certainly in my father's day they would have been. )

I was glad that I wore them that day in the house in Antigua; it did not feel odd at all.  On the other hand, when the same visitors came back the next day I felt relaxed enough to revert to my everyday scruffy black sneakers, and also to wear the silly tourist hat when we went out in the sun for another walk around the neighborhood.

I don't know the language of hats any better than I know the language of ties or dress shoes or sports jackets.  Sport jackets?  (Sport jackets!  Those casual things that you wear -- with a tie! -- when you're not dressing up in a suit or something!  Is a tweed jacket a sport jacket?)  Since our trip I've been trying to learn a little bit about hats, not so much because of my straw hat, but more because a Facebook friend, Polly's husband Andrew, started reporting on the comments he gets from strangers when he goes out on the streets of New York in 2014 in a fedora.  After some internet research, now I at least know roughly what a fedora looks like.  I think maybe I could distinguish a fedora from a stodgy old homburg, for example, but the finer distinctions are beyond my reach.  I think of Lord Peter Wimsey in Dorothy L. Sayers's Have His Carcase, looking at the murder victim's hat:

"Last year's hat, reblocked, with new ribbon.  Shape, a little more emphatic than is quite necessary.  Deduction:  not wealthy, but keen on his personal appearance."


I'm pretty sure that back in, say, the early 60's, my father wore a hat when he went to work. I see him in a dark suit (or maybe just dark pants and a dark sports jacket), with a white shirt and a tie and grownup Daddy shoes and a hat.  A fedora, I suppose?  At the end of the day he would walk into the house and hang up his hat.  Also he would whistle a happy little tune that signaled "I'm home!" Six rapid notes that ran together, hi-lo-hi-lo-hi-loooo.  Sol-mi-sol-mi-sol-mi.  Such a familiar and welcome sound!

By the late 60's the world was changing.  I think he started dressing a little more casually for the office.  When I try to picture him coming home from work in those days, the scene is in color rather than black and white.  I have to ask my sisters what they remember about his hats and shoes and jackets.

I believe that my silly tourist hat is of the type that is called a "Panama hat".  I understand that Panama hats originated in Ecuador, and that the very best ones are so fine that they are waterproof and can be rolled up small for packing without doing them any harm.  Mine is the other extreme:  probably such a bad cheap imitation of a Panama hat that as far as a real hat person is concerned it doesn't deserve the name.  Anyway, I wasn't about to pack it in a bag when we left Guatemala.  It was either wear it or leave it behind.

I could have left it in the house in Antigua.  Come to think of it, there were some straw hats already there.  Quite likely they were meant for our use, left there by the landlord or by previous visitors.  Why did I even buy a hat?  It's true that there was one hat in the house that we didn't think we should touch.  It graced the head of a piece of found art in the living room: a big piece of a tree with raised arms.  But I think I could have borrowed one of the others.  Still, I wanted my very own vacation hat.  And, although I didn't know if I would ever wear it again, I wanted to take it with me when we left for home.

On airplanes there was no problem tucking the hat into an overhead compartment, but in airports I wore it on my head.  It was just one more thing to juggle when going through security.

We flew from Guatemala City to Boston by way of Miami, just like that other time when we were bringing baby Amadi home.  Somehow we had forgotten about the tedious part where you have to recover your checked bags, lug them through immigration and customs, and check them again for the next flight.

Back in the year 2000 our experience in Miami was nightmarish:  we had a narrow window of time between flights, we were slowed down at immigration by having to show adoption papers, and after customs we had to get ourselves, our two-month-old baby, and all of our luggage to the other end of the huge airport in a big hurry using muscle power alone.

This time it was much better:  we had more time, there was now a shuttle train from one end of the terminal to the other, and our baby had become a big thirteen-year-old who could walk on her feet.  Also, we got some streamlined service because 86-year-old Gerry cleverly requested a wheelchair.  But it's still a pretty horrible airport.

(At the baggage carousel:  Asa and I are waiting, waiting, waiting for the bags.  A chatty man next to us:  "Where are you guys from?"  "Boston"  "Oh.  Well, at least you have good sports teams there.  Hey, you have a game this weekend."  [Think.  What is he talking about?  Let's see, what time of year is it?  It's January.  Oh, I bet he's talking about football playoffs.  Wow, I didn't even know the Patriots were in the playoffs this year. ]  "I don't really pay much attention to any sport except baseball. Sometimes not even that.  Where are you from?"  "Chicago.  Miami airport is the worst airport in the world.  I've been coming through here every six months for years.  Once they stole all my Christmas presents.  Oh, they weren't worth much, but still, they were Christmas presents ..." )

Besides the shuttle train, the other nice surprise was the fancy machine for processing your passport.  I think these are very new.  I don't know if all the US points of entry have them yet.  You stand in front of one of a number of big kiosk thingies, and you hold your passport face down on a screen so it can be scanned.  Then the machine tells you to look it in the eye, and it amazingly adjusts itself to your height (even if you are in a wheelchair!), and it takes your picture and prints it out with other data on a slip of paper, which you take to the human agent at the booth on your way out of the hall.  I was the first of the five of us to undergo this process, so I was not exactly ready when the shutter clicked.  I didn't think to take off my reading glasses, which I had put on to study the fascinating gadget and to read the directions it was giving me.  I didn't think to take the hat off, either.  But I did manage to look right into the lens, and to keep my eyes open.  I came off looking like some kind of inept but cheerful spy.  I was really really hoping that we would end up with a copy of the picture to take home, but no:  it stayed with the human agent at the booth.  I would have liked to use it as my new Facebook profile. 

It wasn't until after the trip that it dawned on me how much my hat had to do with my father. In my youth the annual family vacation was a high point of the year for my parents, my sisters, and me.  Every August we would head for the woods and go camping:  either at drive-in campgrounds, or on islands, or in later years on a sort of houseboat.  (We sometimes kept a journal, writing down some memories together each day as we went along.  One of my sisters recently came across the home-made Ship's Log that I made for my father one year.  It was made of an actual log, cut in half, hinged, and filled with blank pages. )  And, now that I think of it, he always had a vacation hat.  He might use the same one two years in a row, but it seems to me that he would often just pick one up on our travels when the mood struck, or when the right hat appeared.  It served to keep the sun off his bald spot, and it was also an emblem of family fun and Daddy in vacation mode.  The one I remember best was the type of striped cloth cap that is associated with locomotive engineers.


Saturday, December 19, 2009

The edge of surfeit

In past years I used to occasionally interrupt my attempts at Christmas shopping by going into a record store and picking up a new seasonal tape or CD. You know: "Oh look, so-and-so has a Christmas album, I wonder if it's any good, it'd be nice to have some more of that stuff to listen to at this time of year." These years I do it at the iTunes store. One advantage is that you can hear a little sample first.

Most of it disappoints. You understand, all I ask for is a few good songs per album, but even so it's a crap shoot. There was the Roches' collection We Three Kings: They sounded like they were making fun of both the music and themselves in every song. Forget it.* And Linda Ronstadt's A Merry Little Christmas: Well, maybe I should have seen that one coming; she's got a way of coating a song in sugary sentiment anyway, and then you put that on top of Christmas and it crosses some horrible threshold ... It's like holiday food. You take for granted that you'll be eating more sugar and more fat than usual, but even so there are moments when it's just too much, even for a guy like me.

That line between "What a delicious holiday treat!" and "Help, I can't stand it! Get this away from me!" is a fine line, and of course it depends on the beholder and on the beholder's mood. Bette Midler made an album called Cool Yule. I have had it for a few years. I had been remembering it as almost in the Ronstadt category, but I listened to it right through yesterday and almost none of it had seriously ill effects. There are a couple of songs there that I'm not sure I would ever want to hear again. And I'm not saying I want to hear her special Christmas version of Nanci Griffith's From a Distance more than, say, three or four times in the season; it resembles an apple pie covered with butter frosting, and it's got incongruous bits of other songs stuck in it like sugarplums. But I'm glad it's there. Her Mele Kalikimaka is perfectly fine, although I can't help hearing it as a slightly pale imitation of the Bing Crosby version. In the case of that song, if you're not going to depart further than that from the canonical version, what's the point? The same applies to I've Got My Love to Keep Me Warm; in this case it's the Dean Martin version that is the reindeer in the room. But I'm really liking her I'll be Home for Christmas and What Are You Doing New Year's Eve? They're neither better nor worse than, respectively, Bing's and Ella's: a bit heavily frosted, but yummy.

In the course of singing a duet with Johnny Mathis, a medley of Winter Wonderland and Let it Snow, Bette calls Mathis "The King of Christmas". Which led me to check out his Christmas stuff. Well, it may be too soon to say, but so far I'm disappointed. Maybe I need to get used to the pace, which is slow, and to that weird way he has of sliding up or down on a note as he modulates to a new key. In any case, it's not a total loss. For one thing, his Sleigh Ride is a keeper. For another, he includes (between two verses!) that intro to WW. At last I have the tune! Oh, and I'm putting his Chestnuts in with all those others (and taking out a couple -- the Crosby/Sinatra and the Brubeck).

* One bright spot: They sing the intro of Winter Wonderland ("Over the ground lies a blanket of white, ... Two hearts are thrilling, in spite of the chilling weather  ..."), which I never knew before. I was happy to find it, but frustrated by the fact that they do it in a kind of three-part harmony that leaves me wondering which of the three parts is the melody.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

All chestnuts, all the time

Well, I did it. I listened to all thirteen renditions of Chestnuts. No regrets, but possibly there are one or two that I never need to hear again.

You wouldn't think that a chorus could really do justice to this song, and you'd probably be right. But it's not that simple: the Mitch Miller version and the Mormon Tabernacle Choir version are really very different. I prefer the latter, though I'll use it sparingly.

It occurs to me that it is not possible to record a version of this song without making implicit reference to the Nat King Cole version. (I am thinking of Borges' "Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote".) For example, if you don't sing "Merry Christ-ma-has" at the end, that's a statement in itself.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Carols

In  The Oxford Book of Carols  there is a footnote to "Good King Wenceslas". It begins

This rather confused narrative owes its popularity to the delightful tune, which is that of a Spring carol, "Tempus adest floridum", No. 99. Unfortunately Neale in 1853 substituted for the Spring carol this 'Good King Wenceslas', one of his less happy pieces, which E. Duncan goes so far as to call 'doggerel', and Bullen condemns as 'poor and commonplace to the last degree'.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Bing

Bing Crosby's album "White Christmas" has twelve songs. These years only about four of them get on my short list of seasonal music.

My favorite thing about Bing's style is the way he dances around the beat: a phrase will have an out-of-rhythm experience to the point where it seems to be getting lost, and then the next thing you know it's home safe and sound, like a ghost returning to its body or a plane to its aircraft carrier.

The second- and third-worst songs, in some order, are "Adeste Fideles" -- Latin with unapologetically American vowels ("A-des-tay Fee-day-lace") -- and the deeply hokey "Christmas in Killarney".

The absolute worst is "Faith of Our Fathers", the only one where Crosby's deliberate rhythmic looseness seems misplaced. He's doing it against a background of choral singing -- and in my opinion pretty lame choral singing and badly recorded at that.

Three of the best are those in which Bing is joined by the Andrews Sisters: "Jingle Bells", "Santa Claus is Coming to Town", and "Mele Kalikimaka"*. The sisters' tightly rhythmic self-contained harmonizing is just what Bing's loosey-goosey crooning needs, and vice versa. Each style enhances the other.

My other favorite is his heartfelt version of "I'll be home for Christmas". (Incidentally, this is what is playing in Nathaniel Fisher's new hearse at the big bad moment in the pilot episode of Six Feet Under.) This season I've been listening to Tony Bennett's cool and breezy version of the same song, but at this point I'm about ready to go back to Bing.

* This is deeply hokey, too, but in a good way.

Thursday, December 3, 2009

It's like an advent calendar, isn't it?

A once a day thing, I mean. My last post was at 11:58 pm on December 2 (in my time zone), and now it's December 3. Maybe I will write about a different Christmas song every day for weeks. Probably not, though.

All I want to say now, before going to bed, is something about "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas": There are some variations in the lyrics. I grew up hearing "Hang a shining star upon the highest bough" at the high point in the final stanza. I was happy to find the alternative "Until then we'll have to muddle through somehow" in the Ella Fitzgerald rendition, and even happier to discover later on that this meatier and more melancholy version of the song was the authentic one from "Meet me in St. Louis". It turns out that the bowdlerized "shining star"version was created especially for Frank Sinatra, who wanted to record the song but needed it to be injected with holiday cheer first. But the kicker is that the good sad version is itself a toned-down version of the songwriter's original truly grim creation, which began:

Have yourself a merry little Christmas, it may be your last ...

Judy Garland refused to sing it that way.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

'Tis the Season

I get a little obsessed with Christmas songs at this time of year. Partly for my daughter's sake but mostly for my own, I load up my iPod with that stuff so that I can play it in the car.

I mean "Christmas songs" in a broad sense. But I do have a slight obsession with "The Christmas Song" itself, informally known as "Chestnuts Roasting on an Open Fire". I guess the guys who wrote it, Mel ("The Golden Fog") Tormé and Bob Wells, were pretty lucky that that title wasn't already taken. They wrote the song in 1944 or 1945, depending which Wikipedia article you believe. Tormé said that they wrote the song while just hanging out one summer day: they began spouting wintry phrases as a way of taking their minds off the heat, and it somehow turned into a song. A year ago I got a little more obsessed than usual with that song, and now I have 13 versions of it in my laptop. Most of them are lousy, so I have only put three of them in the iPod right now, but probably before the season is over I will go on a binge and listen to all 13 of them one day on the way to work. My three favorites are:

(1) Ella Fitzgerald's. Like the rest of the album "Ella Wishes You a Swinging Christmas", this wears well. I could listen to it every day for a month.

(2) The instrumental version by Vince Guaraldi, on the soundtrack of the Charlie Brown Christmas special.

(3) Aaron Neville's. Not quite as durable as Ella's, and not for everyone, but I could listen to it every two days for a month.

The ones that I don't like so much include one by Stevie Wonder that's uninspired and, I don't know, lame. There's also one by Dave Brubeck that's part of a whole album that's just no fun. And, come to think of it, the definitive Nat King Cole version just doesn't do it for me any more.

About Me

I am a professor of mathematics. (I began calling myself "Empty" or Ø when hanging around at blogs, because I am somewhat fixated on the empty set. Students and colleagues know that I can be a bit of an ancient mariner about it.)